2025-05-30
Solutions to Principles of Quantum Mechanics
00

Chapter 8 The Path Integral Formulation of Quantum Theory

8.1 The Path Integral Recipe

8.2 Analysis of the Recipe

8.3 An Approximation to U(t)U(t) for the Free Particle

8.4 Path Integral Evaluation of the Free-Particle Propagator

8.5 Equivalence to the Schrödinger Equation

8.6 Potentials of the Form V=a+bx+cx2+dx˙+exx˙V=a+bx+cx^{2}+d\dot{x}+ex\dot{x}

Exercise 8.6.1 Verify that

U(x,t;x,0)=A(t)exp(iScl/), A(t)=(m2πit)1/2U(x,t;x^{\prime},0)=A(t)\exp(\mathrm{i}S_{\text{cl}}/\hbar),~A(t)=\left(\dfrac{m}{2\pi\hbar\mathrm{i}t}\right)^{1/2}

agrees with the exact result, Eq. (5.4.31), for V(x)=fxV(x)=-fx. Hint: Start with xcl(t)=x0+v0t+12(f/m)t2x_{\text{cl}}(t^{\prime\prime})=x_{0}+v_{0}t^{\prime\prime}+\dfrac{1}{2}(f/m)t^{\prime\prime 2} and find the constants x0x_{0} and v0v_{0} from the requirement that xcl(0)=xx_{\text{cl}}(0)=x^{\prime} and xcl(t)=xx_{\text{cl}}(t)=x.

2025-05-30
Solutions to Principles of Quantum Mechanics
00

Chapter 7 The Harmonic Oscillator

7.1 Why Study the Harmonic Oscillator?

7.2 Review of the Classical Oscillator

7.3 Quantization of the Oscillator (Coordinate Basis)

Exercise 7.3.1 Consider the question why we tried a power-series solution for Eq. (7.3.11) but not Eq. (7.3.8). By feeding in a series into the latter, verify that a three-term recursion relation between Cn+2C_{n+2}, CnC_{n}, and Cn2C_{n-2} obtains, from which the solution does not follow so readily. The problem is that ψ\psi^{\prime\prime} has two powers of yy less than 2εψ2 \varepsilon \psi, while the y2-y^{2} piece has two more powers of yy. In Eq. (7.3.11) on the other hand, of the three pieces uu^{\prime\prime}, 2yu-2yu^{\prime}, and (2ε1)u(2\varepsilon-1)u, the last two have the same powers of yy.

2025-02-19
Solutions to Principles of Quantum Mechanics
00
2024-08-17
Solutions to Principles of Quantum Mechanics
00

Chapter 5 Simple Problems in One Dimension

5.1 The Free Particle

Exercise 5.1.1 Show that Eq. (5.1.9) may be rewritten as an integral over EE and a sum over the ±\pm index as

U(t)=α=±0[m(2mE)1/2]E,αE,αeiEt/dEU(t)=\sum_{\alpha= \pm} \int_0^{\infty}\left[\frac{m}{(2 m E)^{1 / 2}}\right]|E, \alpha\rangle\langle E, \alpha| \mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i} E t / \hbar} \mathrm{d} E
2024-08-06
Solutions to Principles of Quantum Mechanics
00

Chapter 4 The Postulates——a General Discussion

4.1 The Postulates

4.2 Discussion of Postulates I-III

Exercise 4.2.1 Consider the following operators on a Hilbert space V3(C)\mathbb{V}^{3}(C):

Lx=121/2(010101010)Ly=121/2(0i0i0i0i0)Lz=(100000001)L_{x}=\frac{1}{2^{1/2}}\begin{pmatrix} 0&1&0\\ 1&0&1\\ 0&1&0 \end{pmatrix}\qquad L_{y}=\frac{1}{2^{1/2}}\begin{pmatrix} 0&-i&0\\ i&0&-i\\ 0&i&0 \end{pmatrix}\qquad L_{z}=\begin{pmatrix} 1&0&0\\ 0&0&0\\ 0&0&-1 \end{pmatrix}

(1) What are the possible values one can obtain if LzL_{z} is measured?

(2) Take the state in which Lz=1L_{z}=1. In this state what are Lx\langle L_{x}\rangle, Lx2\langle L_{x}^{2}\rangle and ΔLx\Delta L_{x}?

(3) Find the normalized eigenstates and the eigenvalues of LxL_{x} in the LzL_{z} basis.

(4) If the particle is in the state with Lz=1L_{z}=-1, and LxL_{x} is measured, what are the possible outcomes and their probabilities? (5) Consider the state

ψ=(1/21/21/21/2)|\psi\rangle=\begin{pmatrix} 1/2\\ 1/2\\ 1/2^{1/2} \end{pmatrix}

in the LzL_{z} basis. If Lz2L_{z}^{2} is measured in this state and a result +1+1 is obtained, what is the state after the measurement? How probable was this result? If LzL_{z} is measured, what are the outcomes and respective probabilities?

(6) A particle is in a state for which the probabilities are P(Lz=1)=1/4P(L_{z}=1)=1/4, P(Lz=0)=1/2P(L_{z}=0)=1/2, and P(Lz=1)=1/4P(L_{z}=-1)=1/4. Convince yourself that the most general, normalized state with this property is

ψ=eiδ12Lz=1+eiδ221/2Lz=0+eiδ32Lz=1|\psi\rangle=\frac{e^{i \delta_1}}{2}\left|L_z=1\right\rangle+\frac{e^{i \delta_2}}{2^{1 / 2}}\left|L_z=0\right\rangle+\frac{e^{i \delta_3}}{2}\left|L_z=-1\right\rangle

It was stated earlier on that if ψ|\psi\rangle is a normalized state then the state eiθψe^{i \theta}|\psi\rangle is a physically equivalent normalized state. Does this mean that the factors eiδie^{i \delta_i} multiplying the LzL_z eigenstates are irrelevant? [Calculate for example P(Lx=0)P\left(L_x=0\right).]