# Chapter 17 Time-Independence Perturbation Theory
## 17.1 The Formalism
## 17.2 Some Examples
**Exercise 17.2.1** Consider $H^1=\lambda x^4$ for the oscillator problem.

(1) Show that
$$
E_n^1=\frac{3 \hbar^2 \lambda}{4 m^2 \omega^2}\left[1+2 n+2 n^2\right]
$$

(2) Argue that no matter how small $\lambda$ is, the perturbation expansion will break down for some large enough $n$. What is the physical reason?



**Exercise 17.2.2** Consider a spin-1/2 particle with gyromagnetic ratio $\gamma$ in a magnetic field $\mathbf{B}=B \mathbf{i}+B_0 \mathbf{k}$. Treating $B$ as a perturbation, calculate the first- and second-order shifts in energy and first-order shift in wave function for the ground state. Then compare the exact answers expanded to the corresponding orders.

**Exercise 17.2.3** In our study of the H atom, we assumed that the proton is a point charge $e$. This leads to the familiar Coulomb interaction $\left(-e^2/r\right)$ with the electron.

(1) Show that if the proton is a uniformly dense charge distribution of radius $R$, the interaction is
$$
\begin{aligned}
V(r) & =-\frac{3 e^2}{2 R}+\frac{e^2 r^2}{2 R^3}, & & r \leqslant R \\
& =-\frac{e^2}{r}, & & r>R
\end{aligned}
$$

(2) Calculate the first-order shift in the ground-state energy of hydrogen due to this modification. You may assume $\mathrm{e}^{-R / a_0} \simeq 1$. You should find $E^1=2 e^2 R^2 / 5 a_0^3$.

**Exercise 17.2.4** (1) Prove the Thomas-Reiche-Kuhn sum rule
$$
\sum_{n^{\prime}}\left(E_{n^{\prime}}-E_n\right)|\langle n^{\prime}\mid X\mid n\rangle|^ 2=\sum_{n^{\prime}}\left(E_{n^{\prime}}-E_n\right)\langle n\mid X\mid n^{\prime}\rangle\langle n^{\prime}\mid X\mid n\rangle=\frac{\hbar^2}{2 m}
$$
where $|n\rangle$ and $\left|n^{\prime}\right\rangle$ are eigenstates of $H=P^2 / 2 m+V(X)$. [Hint: Eliminate the $E_{n^{\prime}}-E_n$ factor in favor of $H$.]

(2) Test the sum rule on the $n$th state of the oscillator.

**Exercise 17.2.5** We have seen that if we neglect the repulsion $e^2 / r_{12}$ between the two electrons in the ground state of He , the energy is $-8 \mathrm{Ry}=-108.8~\mathrm{eV}$. Treating $e^2 / r_{12}$ as a perturbation, show that
$$
\langle 100,100| H^1|100,100\rangle=\frac{5}{2} \mathrm{Ry}
$$
so that $E_0^0+E_0^1=-5.5 . \mathrm{Ry}=-74.8~\mathrm{eV}$. Recall that the measured value is $-78.6~\mathrm{eV}$ and the variational estimate is $-77.5~\mathrm{eV}$. [Hint: $\left\langle H^1\right\rangle$ can be viewed as the interaction between two concentric, spherically symmetric exponentially falling charge distributions. Find the potential $\phi(r)$ due to one distribution and calculate the interaction energy between this potential and the other charge distribution.]

**Exercise 17.2.6** Verify Eq. (17.2.34).

**Exercise 17.2.7** For the oscillator, consider $H^1=-qfX$. Find an $\Omega$ that satisfies Eq. (17.2.38). Feed it into Eq. (17.2.39) for $E_n^2$ and compare with the earlier calculation.

**Exercise 17.2.8** Fill in the steps connecting Eqs. (17.2.41) and (17.2.43). Try to use symmetry arguments to reduce the labor involved in evaluating the integrals.
## 17.3 Degenerate Pertubation Theory
**Exercise 17.3.1** Use the dipole selection rules to show that $H^1$ has the above form and carry out the evaluation of $\Delta$.

**Exercise 17.3.2** Consider a spin-1 particle (with no orbital degrees of freedom). Let $H=A S_z^2+B\left(S_x^2-S_y^2\right)$, where $S_i$ are $3 \times 3$ spin matrices, and $A \gg B$. Treating the $B$ term as a perturbation, find the eigenstates of $H^0=A S_z^2$ that are stable under the perturbation. Calculate the energy shifts to first order in $B$. How are these related to the exact answers?

**Exercise 17.3.3** Consider the case where $H^0$ includes the Coulomb plus spin-orbit interaction and $H^1$ is the effect of a weak magnetic field $\mathbf{B}=B \mathbf{k}$. Using the appropriate basis, show that the first-order level shift is related to $j_z$ by
$$
E^1=\left(\frac{e B}{2 m c}\right)\left(1 \pm \frac{1}{2 l+1}\right) j_z, \quad j=l \pm 1 / 2
$$
Sketch the levels for the $n=2$ level assuming that $E^1 \ll E_{\text{f.s.}}^1$.

**Exercise 17.3.4** We discuss here some tricks for evaluating the expectation values of certain operators in the eigenstates of hydrogen.

(1) Suppose we want $\langle 1 / r\rangle_{nlm}$. Consider first $\langle\lambda / r\rangle$. We can interpret $\langle\lambda / r\rangle$ as the first order correction due to a perturbation $\lambda / r$. Now this problem can be solved exactly; we just replace $e^2$ by $e^2-\lambda$ everywhere. (Why?) So the exact energy, from Eq. (13.1.16) is $E(\lambda)=$ $-\left(e^2-\lambda\right)^2 m / 2 n^2 \hbar^2$. The first-order correction is the term linear in $\lambda$, that is, $E^1=m e^2 \lambda / n^2 \hbar^2=$ $\langle\lambda / r\rangle$, from which we get $\langle 1 / r\rangle=1 / n^2 a_0$, in agreement with Eq. (13.1.36). For later use, let us observe that as $E(\lambda)=E^0+E^1+\cdots=E(\lambda=0)+\lambda(\mathrm{d}E/\mathrm{d}\lambda)_{\lambda=0}+\cdots$, one way to extract $E^1$ from the exact answer is to calculate $\lambda(\mathrm{d}E/\mathrm{d}\lambda)_{\lambda=0}$.

(2) Consider now $\left\langle\lambda / r^2\right\rangle$. In this case, an exact solution is possible since the perturbation just modifies the centrifugal term as follows:
$$
\frac{\hbar^2 l(l+1)}{2 m r^2}+\frac{\lambda}{r^2}=\frac{\hbar^2 l^{\prime}\left(l^{\prime}+1\right)}{2 m r^2}\tag{17.3.23}
$$
where $l^{\prime}$ is a function of $\lambda$. Now the dependence of $E$ on $l^{\prime}(\lambda)$ is, from Eq. (13.1.14),
$$
E\left(l^{\prime}\right)=\frac{-m e^4}{2 \hbar^2\left(k+l^{\prime}+1\right)^2}=E(\lambda)=E^0+E^1+\cdots
$$
Show that
$$
\left\langle\frac{\lambda}{r^3}\right\rangle=E^1=\left.\lambda \frac{\mathrm{d}E}{\mathrm{d}\lambda}\right|_{\lambda=0}=\left(\frac{\mathrm{d}E}{\mathrm{d}l^{\prime}}\right)_{l^{\prime}=l} \cdot\left(\frac{\mathrm{d}l^{\prime}}{\mathrm{d} \lambda}\right)_{l^{\prime}=l} \cdot \lambda=\frac{\lambda}{n^3 a_0^2\left(l+\frac{1}{2}\right)}
$$
Canceling $\lambda$ on both sides, we get Eq. (17.3.11).

(3) Consider finally $\left\langle l / r^3\right\rangle$. Since there is no such term in the Coulomb Hamiltonian, we resort to another trick. Consider the radial momentum operator, $p_r=-i \hbar(\partial / \partial r+1 / r)$, in terms of which we may write the radial part of the Hamiltonian
$$
\left(\frac{-\hbar^2}{2 m}\right)\left(\frac{1}{r^2} \frac{\partial}{\partial r} r^2 \frac{\partial}{\partial r}\right)
$$
as $p_r^2 / 2 m$. (Verify this.) Using the fact that $\left\langle\left[H, p_r\right]\right\rangle=0$ in the energy eigenstates, and by explictly evaluating the commutator, show that
$$
\left\langle\frac{1}{r^3}\right\rangle=\frac{1}{a_0(l)(l+1)}\left\langle\frac{1}{r^2}\right\rangle
$$
combining which with the result from part (2) we get Eq. (17.3.20).

(4) Find the mean kinetic energy using the trick from part (1), this time rescaling the mass. Regain the virial theorem.

Chapter 17 Time-Independence Perturbation Theory

# Chapter 16 Variational and WKB Methods
## 16.1 The Variatonal Method
**Exercise 16.1.1** Try $\psi=\exp \left(-\alpha x^2\right)$ for $V=\dfrac{1}{2} m \omega^2 x^2$ and find $\alpha_0$ and $E\left(\alpha_0\right)$.



**Exercise 16.1.2** For a particle in a box that extends from $-a$ to $a$, try (within the box) $\psi=(x-a)(x+a)$ and calculate $E$. There is no parameter to vary, but you still get an upper bound. Compare it to the true energy, $E_0$. (Convince yourself that the singularities in $\psi^{\prime \prime}$ at $x= \pm a$ do not contribute to the energy.)

**Exercise 16.1.3** For the attractive delta function potential $V=-a V_0 \delta(x)$ use a Gaussian trial function. Calculate the upper bound on $E_0$ and compare it to the exact answer ($-m a^2 V_0^2/2\hbar^2$) (Exercise 5.2.3).

**Exercise 16.1.4** For the oscillator choose
$$
\begin{aligned}
\psi & =(x-a)^2(x+a)^2, & & |x| \leqslant a \\
& =0, & & |x|>a
\end{aligned}
$$
Calculate $E(a)$, minimize it and compare to $\hbar \omega / 2$.

**Exercise 16.1.5** Solve the variational problem for the $l=1$ states of the electron in a potential $V=-e^2/r$. In your trial function incorporate (i) correct behavior as $r \rightarrow 0$, appropriate to $l=1$, (ii) correct number of nodes to minimize energy, (iii) correct behavior of wave function as $r \rightarrow \infty$ in a Coulomb potential (i.e., exponential instead of Gaussian damping). Does it matter what $m$ you choose for $Y_l^m$ ? Comment on the relation of the energy bound you obtain to the exact answer.
## 16.2 The Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin Method
**Exercise 16.2.1** Consider the function $W(E)$ introduced in Eq. (16.2.21a). Since $-E$ is the $t$ derivative of $S(t)$, it follows that $W(E)$, must be the Legendre transform of $S$. In this case $t$ must emerge as the derivative of $W(E)$ with respect to $E$. Verify that differentiation of the formula
$$
W(E)=\int_{x^{\prime}}^x \sqrt{2 m\left(E-V\left(x^{\prime \prime}\right)\right)} \mathrm{d} x^{\prime \prime}
$$
gives the time $t$ taken to go from start to finish at this preassigned energy.

**Exercise 16.2.2** Consider the free particle problem using the approach given above. Now that you know the wave functions explicitly, evaluate the integral in Eq. (16.2.18b) by contour integration to obtain
$$
U\left(x, x^{\prime}, t\right)=\theta\left(x-x^{\prime}\right) \mathrm{e}^{(\mathrm{i}/\hbar) \sqrt{2 m E}\left(x-x^{\prime}\right)}+\theta\left(x^{\prime}-x\right) \mathrm{e}^{(-\mathrm{i}/\hbar) \sqrt{2 m E}\left(x-x^{\prime}\right)}
$$
In doing the contour integrals, ask in which half-plane you can close the contour for a given sign of $x-x^{\prime}$. Compare the above result to the semiclassical result and make sure it all works out. Note that there is no need to form the combination $U\left(x, x^{\prime}, t\right)+U^*\left(x, x^{\prime}, t\right)$; we can calculate both the principal part and the delta function contributions explicitly because we know the $p$-dependence of the integrand explicitly. To see this more clearly, avoid the contour integral approach and use instead the formula for $(x \pm i \varepsilon)^{-1}$ given above. Evaluate the principal value integral and the contribution from the delta function and see how they add up to the result of contour integration. Although both routes are possible here, in the problem with $V \neq 0$ contour integration is not possible since the $p$-dependence of the wave function in the complex $p$ plane is not known. The advantage of the $U+U^*$ approach is that it only refers to quantities on the real axis and at just one energy.

**Exercise 16.2.3** Let us take a second look at our derivation. We worked quite hard to isolate the eigenfunctions at one energy: we formed the combination $U\left(x, x^{\prime}, z\right)+U^*\left(x, x^{\prime}, z\right)$ to get rid of the principal part and filter out the delta function. Now it is clear that if in Eq. (16.2.18a) we could integrate in the range $-\infty \leqslant t \leqslant \infty$, we would get the $\delta$ function we want. What kept us from doing that was the fact the $U(t)$ was constructed to be used for $t>0$. However, if we use the time evolution operator $\mathrm{e}^{-(\mathrm{i}/\hbar)Ht}$ for negative times, it will simply tell us what the system was doing at earlier times, assuming the same Hamiltonian. Thus we can make sense of the operator for negative times as well and define a transform that extends over all times. This is true in classical mechanics as well. For instance, if a stone is thrown straight up from a tall building and we ask when it will be at ground level, we get two answers, one with negative $t$ corresponding to the extrapolation of the given initial conditions to earlier times. Verify that $U\left(x, x^{\prime}, z\right)+U^*\left(x, x^{\prime}, z\right)$ is indeed the transform of $U(t)$ for all times by seeing what happens to $\langle x\mid \mathrm{e}^{-(\mathrm{i}/\hbar)Hf}\mid x^{\prime}\rangle$ under complex conjugation and the exchange $x \leftrightarrow x^{\prime}$. Likewise, ask what happens to $U_{\mathrm{cl}}$ when we transform it for all times. Now you will find that no matter what the sign of $x-x^{\prime}$ a single right moving trajectory can contribute-it is just that the time of the stationary point, $t^*$, will change sign with the sign of $x-x^{\prime}$. (The same goes for a left moving trajectory.)

**Exercise 16.2.4** Alpha particles of kinetic energy $4.2~\mathrm{MeV}$ come tunneling out of a nucleus of charge $Z=90$ (after emission). Assume that $V_0=0$, $x_0=10^{-12}~\mathrm{cm}$, and $V(x)$ is just Coulombic for $x \geqslant x_0$. (See Fig. 16.1) Estimate the mean lifetime. [Hint: Show $\gamma=\left(8 Z e^2 / \hbar v\right)\left[\cos ^{-1} y^{1 / 2}-y^{1 / 2}(1-y)^{1 / 2}\right]$, where $y=x_0 \mid x_e$. Show that $y \ll 1$ and use $\cos^{-1} y^{1/2} \simeq \dfrac{1}{2}\pi -y^{1/2}$ before calculating numbers.]

**Exercise 16.2.5** In 1974 two new particles called the $\psi$ and $\psi^{\prime}$ were discovered, with rest energies $3.1$ and $3.7~\mathrm{GeV}$, respectively ($1~\mathrm{GeV}=10^9~\mathrm{eV}$). These are believed to be nonrelativistic bound states of a “charmed” quark of mass $m=1.5~\mathrm{GeV}/c^2$ (i.e., $mc^2=1.5~\mathrm{GeV}$) and an antiquark of the same mass, in a linear potential $V(r)=V_0+kr$. By assuming that these are the $n=0$ and $n=1$ bound states of zero orbital angular momentum, calculate $V_0$ using the WKB formula. What do you predict for the rest mass of $\psi^{\prime \prime}$, the $n=2$ state? (The measured value is $\simeq 4.2~\mathrm{GeV}/c^2$.) [Hints: (1) Work with $\mathrm{GeV}$ instead of $\mathrm{eV}$. (2) There is no need to determine $k$ explicitly.]

**Exercise 16.2.6** Obtain Eq. (16.2.39) for the $\lambda x^4$ potential by the scaling trick.

**Exercise 16.2.7** Find the allowed levels of the harmonic oscillator by the WKB method.

**Exercise 16.2.8** Consider the $l=0$ radial equation for the Coulomb problem. Since $V(r)$ is singular at the turning point $r=0$, we can't use ($n+3/4$).

(1) Will the additive constant be more or less than $3/4$?

(2) By analyzing the exact equation near $r=0$, it can be shown that the constant equals $1$. Using this constant show that the WKB energy levels agree with the exact results.

Chapter 16 Variational and WKB Methods

# Chapter 15 Addition of Angular Momenta
## 15.1 A Simple Example
**Exercise 15.1.1** Derive Eqs. (15.1.10) and (15.1.11). It might help to use
$$
\mathbf{S}_1 \cdot \mathbf{S}_2=S_{1 z} S_{2 z}+\frac{1}{2}\left(S_{1+} S_{2-}+S_{1-} S_{2+}\right)\tag{15.1.12}
$$



**Exercise 15.1.2** In addition to the Coulomb interaction, there exists another, called the hyperfine interaction, between the electron and proton in the hydrogen atom. The Hamiltonian describing this interaction, which is due to the magnetic moments of the two particles is,
$$
H_{h f}=A \mathbf{S}_1 \cdot \mathbf{S}_2 \quad(A>0)\tag{15.1.22}
$$
(This formula assumes the orbital state of the electron is $|1,0,0\rangle$.) The total Hamiltonian is thus the Coulomb Hamiltonian plus $H_{h f}$.

\noindent (1) Show that $H_{h f}$ splits the ground state into two levels:
$$
\begin{aligned}
E_{+} & =-\mathrm{Ry}+\frac{\hbar^2 A}{4} \\
E_{-} & =-\mathrm{Ry}-\frac{3 \hbar^2 A}{4}
\end{aligned}\tag{15.1.23}
$$
and that corresponding states are triplets and singlet, respectively.

(2) Try to estimate the frequency of the emitted radiation as the atom jumps from the triplet to the singlet. To do so, you may assume that the electron and proton are two dipoles $\mu_e$ and $\mu_p$ separated by a distance $a_0$, with an interaction energy of the order (The description here is oversimplified; both $\mathscr{H}_{hf}$ and $H_{hf}$ are rather tricky to derive. Our aim is just to estimate $|A|$ and not to get into its precise origin.)
$$
\mathscr{H}_{h f} \cong \frac{\mu_e \cdot \mu_p}{a_0^3}
$$
Show that this implies that the constant in Eq. (15.1.22) is
$$
A \sim \frac{2 e}{2 m c} \frac{(5.6) e}{2 M c} \frac{1}{a_0^3}
$$
(where 5.6 is the $g$ factor for the proton), and that
$$
\Delta E=E_{+}-E_{-}=A \hbar^2
$$
is a correction of order $(m / M) \alpha^2$ relative to the ground-state energy. Estimate that the frequency of emitted radiation is a few tens of centimeters, using the mnemonics from Chapter 13. The measured value is $21.4~\mathrm{cm}$. This radiation, called the $21-\mathrm{cm}$ line, is a way to detect hydrogen in other parts of the universe.

(3) Estimate the probability ratio $P(\text{triplet})/P(\text{singlet})$ of hydrogen atoms in thermal equilibrium at room temperature.
## 15.2 The General Problem
**Exercise 15.2.1** (1) Verify that $\left|j_1 j_1, j_2 j_2\right\rangle$ is indeed a state of $j=j_1+j_2$ by letting $J^2=J_1^2+J_2^2+2 J_{1 z} J_{2 z}+J_{1+} J_{2-}+J_{1-} J_{2+}$ act on it.

(2) Verify that the right-hand side of Eq. (15.2.8) indeed has angular momentum $j=j_1+j_2-1$.

**Exercise 15.2.2** Find the CG coefficients of

(1) $\dfrac{1}{2}\otimes 1=\dfrac{3}{2}\oplus \dfrac{1}{2}$

(2) $1\otimes 1=2\oplus 1\oplus 0$

**Exercise 15.2.3** Argue that $\dfrac{1}{2}\otimes\dfrac{1}{2}\otimes\dfrac{1}{2}=\dfrac{3}{2}\oplus\dfrac{1}{2}\oplus\dfrac{1}{2}$.

**Exercise 15.2.4** Derive Eqs. (15.2.19) and (15.2.20).

**Exercise 15.2.5** (1) Show that $\mathbb{P}_1=\dfrac{3}{4} I+\left(\mathbf{S}_1 \cdot \mathbf{S}_2\right) / \hbar^2$ and $\mathbb{P}_0=\dfrac{1}{4} I-\left(\mathbf{S}_1 \cdot \mathbf{S}_2\right) / \hbar^2$ are projection operators, i.e., obey $\mathbb{P}_i \mathbb{P}_j=\delta_{i j} \mathbb{P}_j$ [use Eq. (14.3.39)].

(2) Show that these project into the spin-1 and spin-0 spaces in $\dfrac{1}{2} \otimes \dfrac{1}{2}=1 \oplus 0$.

**Exercise 15.2.6** Construct the project operators $\mathbb{P}_{\pm}$ for the $j=l \pm 1 / 2$ subspaces in the addition $\mathbf{L}+\mathbf{S}=\mathbf{J}$.

**Exercise 15.2.7** Show that when we add $j_1$ to $j_1$, the states with $j=2 j_1$ are symmetric. Show that the states with $j=2 j_1=1$ are antisymmetric. (Argue for the symmetry of the top states and show that lowering does not change symmetry.) This pattern of alternating symmetry continues as $j$ decreases, but is harder to prove.
## 15.3 Irreducible Tensor Operators
**Exercise 15.3.1** (1) Show that Eq. (15.3.11) follows from Eq. (15.3.10) when one considers infinitesimal rotations. (Hint: $D_{q^{\prime} q}^{(k)}=\left\langle kq^{\prime}\right| I-(\mathrm{i}\delta\boldsymbol{\theta} \cdot \mathbf{J}) / \hbar|k q\rangle$. Pick $\delta \boldsymbol{\theta}$ along, say, the $x$ direction and then generalize the result to the other directions.)

(2) Verify that the spherical tensor $V_1^q$ constructed out of $V$ as in Eq. (15.3.15) obeys Eq. (15.3.11).

**Exercise 15.3.2** It is claimed that $\sum\limits_q (-1)^q S_k^q T_k^{(-q)}$ is a scalar operator.

(1) For $k=1$, verify that this is just $\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{T}$.

(2) Prove it in general by considering its response to a rotation. [Hint: $D_{-m,-m^{\prime}}^{(j)}=(-1)^{m-m^{\prime}}\left(D_{m, m^{\prime}}^{(j)}\right)^*$.]

**Exercise 15.3.3** (1) Using $\langle j j \mid j j, 10\rangle=[j /(j+1)]^{1 / 2}$ show that
$$
\langle\alpha j|\left|J_1\right|\left|\alpha^{\prime} j^{\prime}\right\rangle=\delta_{\alpha \alpha^{\prime}} \delta_{j j} \hbar[j(j+1)]^{1 / 2}
$$

(2) Using $\boldsymbol{J} \cdot \mathbf{A}=J_z A_z+\dfrac{1}{2}\left(J_{-} A_{+}+J_{+} A_{-}\right)$(where $A_{\pm}=A_x \pm i A_y$ ) argue that
$$
\left\langle\alpha^{\prime} j m^{\prime}\right| \mathbf{J} \cdot \mathbf{A}|\alpha j m\rangle=c\left\langle\alpha^{\prime} j\mid |A| \mid \alpha j\right\rangle
$$
where $c$ is a constant independent of $\alpha, \alpha^{\prime}$ and $\mathbf{A}$. Show that $c=\hbar[j(j+1)]^{1 / 2} \delta_{m, m^{\prime}}$.

(3) Using the above, show that
$$
\left\langle\alpha^{\prime} j m^{\prime}\right| A^q|\alpha j m\rangle=\frac{\left\langle\alpha^{\prime} j m\right| \mathbf{J} \cdot \mathbf{A}|\alpha j m\rangle}{\hbar^2 j(j+1)}\left\langle j m^{\prime}\right| J^q|j m\rangle
$$

**Exercise 15.3.4** (1) Consider a system whose angular momentum consists of two parts $\mathbf{J}_1$ and $\mathbf{J}_2$ and whose magnetic moment is
$$
\boldsymbol{\mu}=\gamma_1 \mathbf{J}_1+\gamma_2 \mathbf{J}_2
$$
In a state $\left|j m, j_1 j_2\right\rangle$ show, using Eq. (15.3.19), that
$$
\begin{aligned}
& \left\langle\mu_x\right\rangle=\left\langle\mu_y\right\rangle=0 \\
& \left\langle\mu_z\right\rangle=m \hbar\left[\frac{\gamma_1+\gamma_2}{2}+\frac{\left(\gamma_1-\gamma_2\right)}{2} \frac{j_1\left(j_1+1\right)-j_2\left(j_2+1\right)}{j(j+1)}\right]
\end{aligned}
$$

(2) Apply this to the problem of a proton $(g=5.6)$ in a ${ }^2 P_{1 / 2}$ state and show that $\left\langle\mu_z\right\rangle=$ $\pm 0.26$ nuclear magnetons.

(3) For an electron in a ${ }^2 P_{1 / 2}$ state show that $\left\langle\mu_z\right\rangle=\pm \dfrac{1}{3}$ Bohr magnetons.

**Exercise 15.3.5** Show that $\langle j m\mid T_k^q\mid j m\rangle=0$ if $k>2 j$.
## 15.4 Explanation of Some “Accidental” Degeneracies

Chapter 15 Addition of Angular Momenta

# Chapter 14 Spin
## 14.1 Introduction
## 14.2 What is the Nature of Spin?
## 14.3 Kinematics of Spin
**Exercise 14.3.1** Let us verify the above corollary explicitly. Take some spinor with components $\alpha=\rho_1 \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i} \phi_1}$ and $\beta=\rho_2 \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i} \phi_2}$. From $\langle\chi \mid \chi\rangle=1$, deduce that we can write $\rho_1=\cos (\theta / 2)$ and $\rho_2=\sin (\theta / 2)$ for some $\theta$. Next pull out a common phase factor so that the spinor takes the form in Eq. (14.3.28a). This verifies the corollary and also fixes $\hat{n}$.



**Exercise 14.3.2** (1) Show that the eigenvectors of $\boldsymbol{\sigma}\cdot\hat{n}$ are given by Eq. (14.3.28).

(2) Verify Eq. (14.3.29).

**Exercise 14.3.3** Using Eqs. (14.3.32) and (14.3.33) show that the Pauli matrices are traceless.

**Exercise 14.3.4** Derive Eq. (14.3.39) in two different ways.

(1) Write $\sigma_{1}\sigma_{2}$ in terms of $[\sigma_{i},\sigma_{j}]_{+}$ and $[\sigma_{i},\sigma_{j}]$.

(2) Use Eqs. (14.3.42) and (14.3.43).

**Exercise 14.3.5** Express the following matrix $M$ in terms of the Pauli matrices:
$$
M=\begin{pmatrix}
\alpha & \beta \\
\gamma & \delta
\end{pmatrix}
$$

**Exercise 14.3.6** (1) Argue that $|\hat{n},+\rangle=U[R(\phi \mathbf{k})] U[R(\theta \mathbf{j})]\left|s_z=\hbar / 2\right\rangle$.

(2) Verify by explicit calculation.

**Exercise 14.3.7** Express the following as linear combinations of the Pauli matrices and $I$:

(1) $\left(I+\mathrm{i} \sigma_x\right)^{1 / 2}$. (Relate it to half a certain rotation.)

(2) $\left(2 I+\sigma_x\right)^{-1}$.

(3) $\sigma_x^{-1}$.

**Exercise 14.3.8** (1) Show that any matrix that commutes with $\boldsymbol{\sigma}$ is a multiple of the unit matrix.

(2) Show that we cannot find a matrix that anticommutes with all three Pauli matrices. (If such a matrix exists, it must equal zero.)
## 14.4 Spin Dynamics
**Exercise 14.4.1** Show that if $H=-\gamma \mathbf{L} \cdot \mathbf{B}$, and $\mathbf{B}$ is position independent,
$$
\frac{\mathrm{d}\langle\mathbf{L}\rangle}{\mathrm{d} t}=\langle\boldsymbol{\mu} \times \mathbf{B}\rangle=\langle\boldsymbol{\mu}\rangle \times \mathbf{B}
$$

**Exercise 14.4.2** Derive (14.4.31) by studying Fig. 14.3.

**Exercise 14.4.3** We would like to study here the evolution of a state that starts out as $\binom{1}{0}$ and is subject to the $\mathbf{B}$ field given in Eq. (14.4.27). This state obeys
$$
\mathrm{i} \hbar \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} t}|\psi(t)\rangle=H|\psi\rangle\tag{14.4.34}
$$
where $H=-\gamma \mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{B}$, and $\mathbf{B}$ is time dependent. Since classical reasoning suggests that in a frame rotating at frequency ($-\omega \mathbf{k}$) the Hamiltonian should be time independent and governed by $\mathbf{B}_r$ [Eq. (14.4.29)], consider the ket in the rotating frame, $\left|\psi_r(t)\right\rangle$, related to $|\psi(t)\rangle$ by a rotation angle $\omega t$:
$$
\left|\psi_r(t)\right\rangle=\mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i} \omega t S_z / \hbar}|\psi(t)\rangle\tag{14.4.35}
$$
Combine Eqs. (14.4.34) and (14.4.35) to derive Schrödinger's equation for $\left|\psi_r(t)\right\rangle$ in the $S_z$ basis and verify that the classical expectation is borne out. Solve for $\left|\psi_r(t)\right\rangle=U_r(t)\left|\psi_r(0)\right\rangle$ by computing $U_r(t)$, the propagator in the rotating frame. Rotate back to the lab and show that
$$
|\psi(t)\rangle \xrightarrow[S_{z}~\text{basis}]{ }\left[\begin{array}{c}
{\left[\cos \left(\frac{\omega_r t}{2}\right)+\mathrm{i} \frac{\omega_0-\omega}{\omega_r} \sin \left(\frac{\omega_r t}{2}\right)\right] \mathrm{e}^{+\mathrm{i} \omega t / 2}} \\
\frac{\mathrm{i} \gamma B}{\omega_r} \sin \left(\frac{\omega_r t}{2}\right) \mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i} \omega t / 2}
\end{array}\right]\tag{14.4.36}
$$
Compare this to the state $|\hat{\mathbf{n}},+\rangle$ and see what is happening to the spin for the case $\omega_0=\omega$.

Calculate $\left\langle\mu_z(t)\right\rangle$ and verify that it agrees with Eq. (14.4.31).

**Exercise 14.4.4** At $t=0$, an electron is in the state with $s_z=\hbar/2$. A steady field $\mathbf{B}=B \mathbf{i}$, $B=100 \mathrm{G}$, is turned on. How many seconds will it take for the spin to flip?

**Exercise 14.4.5** We would like to establish the validity of Eq. (14.4.26) when $\boldsymbol{\omega}$ and $\mathbf{B}_0$ are not parallel.

(1) Consider a vector $\mathbf{V}$ in the inertial (nonrotating) frame which changes by $\Delta \mathbf{V}$ in a time $\Delta t$. Argue, using the results from Exercise 12.4.3, that the change as seen in a frame rotating at an angular velocity $\boldsymbol{\omega}$, is $\Delta \mathbf{V}-\boldsymbol{\omega} \times \mathbf{V} \Delta t$. Obtain a relation between the time derivatives of $\mathbf{V}$ in the two frames.

(2) Apply this result to the case of $\mathbf{l}$ [Eq. (14.4.8)], and deduce the formula for the effective field in the rotating frame.

**Exercise 14.4.6** (A Density Matrix Problem)
(1) Show that the density matrix for an ensemble of spin-1/2 particles may be written as
$$
\rho=\frac{1}{2}(I+\mathbf{a} \cdot \boldsymbol{\sigma})
$$
where $\mathbf{a}$ is a $c$-number vector.

(2) Show that $\mathbf{a}$ is the mean polarization, $\langle\overline{\boldsymbol{\sigma}}\rangle$.

(3) An ensemble of electrons in a magnetic field $\mathbf{B}=B \mathbf{k}$, is in thermal equilibrium at temperature $T$. Construct the density matrix for this ensemble. Calculate $\langle\overline{\boldsymbol{\mu}}\rangle$.
## 14.5 Return of Orbital Degrees of Freedom
**Exercise 14.5.1** (1) Why is the coupling of the proton's intrinsic moment to B an order $m / M$ correction to Eq. (14.5.4)?

(2) Why is the coupling of its orbital motion an order $(m / M)^2$ correction? (You may reason classically in both parts.)

**Exercise 14.5.2** (1) Estimate the relative size of the level splitting in the $n=1$ state to the unperturbed energy of the $n=1$ state, when a field $\mathbf{B}=1000 \mathrm{kG}$ is applied.

(2) Recall that we have been neglecting the order $B^2$ term in $H$. Estimate its contribution in the $n=1$ state relative to the linear ($-\boldsymbol{\mu} \cdot \mathbf{B}$) term we have kept, by assuming the electron moves on a classical orbit of radius $a_0$. Above what $|\mathbf{B}|$ does it begin to be a poor approximation?

**Exercise 14.5.3** A beam of spin-1/2 particles moving along the $y$ axis goes through two collinear SG apparatuses, both with lower beams blocked. The first has its B field along the $z$ axis and the second has its $\mathbf{B}$ field along the $x$ axis (i.e., is obtained by rotating the first by an angle $\pi / 2$ about the $y$ axis). What fraction of particles leaving the first will exit the second? If a third filter that transmits only spin up along the $z$ axis is introduced, what fraction of particles leaving the first will exit the third? If the middle filter transmits both spins up and down (no blocking) the $x$ axis, but the last one transmits only spin down the $z$ axis, what fraction of particles leaving the first will leave the last?

**Exercise 14.5.4** A beam of spin-1 particles, moving along the $y$ axis, is incident on two collinear SG apparatuses, the first with $\mathbf{B}$ along the $z$ axis and the second with $\mathbf{B}$ along the $z^{\prime}$ axis, which lies in the $x-z$ plane at an angle $\theta$ relative to the $z$ axis. Both apparatuses transmit only the uppermost beams. What fraction leaving the first will pass the second?

Chapter 14 Spin

# Chapter 13 The Hydrogen Atom
## 13.1 The Eigenvalue Problem
**Exercise 13.1.1** Derive Eqs. (13.1.11) and (13.1.14) starting from Eqs. (13.1.8)-(13.1.10).



**Exercise 13.1.2** Derive the degeneracy formula, Eq. (13.1.18).

**Exercise 13.1.3** Starting from the recursion relation, obtain $\psi_{210}$ (normalized).

**Exercise 13.1.4** Recall from the last chapter [Eq. (12.6.19)] that as $r \rightarrow \infty$, $U_E \sim(r)^{m e^2 / \kappa \hbar^2} \mathrm{e}^{-\kappa r}$ in a Coulomb potential $V=-\mathrm{e}^2 / r$ $\left[\kappa=\left(2 m W / \hbar^2\right)^{1 / 2}\right]$. Show that this agrees with Eq. (13.1.26).

**Exercise 13.1.5** (Virial Theorem) Since $|n, l, m\rangle$ is a stationary state, $\langle\dot{\mathbf{\Omega}}\rangle=0$ for any $\mathbf{\Omega}$.\\ Consider $\mathbf{\Omega}=\mathbf{R} \cdot \mathbf{P}$ and use Ehrenfest's theorem to show that $\langle T\rangle=(-1 / 2)\langle V\rangle$ in the state $|n, l, m\rangle$.

## 13.2 The Degeneracy of the Hydrogen Spectrum
**Exercise 13.2.1** Let us see why the conservation of the Runge-Lenz vector $\mathbf{n}$ implies closed orbits.

(1) Express $\mathbf{n}$ in terms of $\mathbf{r}$ and $\mathbf{p}$ alone (get rid of $\mathbf{1}$).

(2) Since the particle is bound, it cannot escape to infinity. So, as we follow it from some arbitrary time onward, it must reach a point $\mathbf{r}_{\max}$ where its distance from the origin stops growing. Show that
$$
\mathbf{n}=\mathbf{r}_{\max}\left(2 E+\frac{\mathrm{e}^2}{r_{\max}}\right)
$$
## 13.3 Numerical Estimates and Comparison with Experiment
**Exercise 13.3.1** The pion has a range of $1~\mathrm{Fermi}=10^{-5} \text{\AA}$ as a mediator of nuclear force. Estimate its rest energy.

**Exercise 13.3.2** Estimate the de Broglie wavelength of an electron of kinetic energy $200~\mathrm{eV}$. (Recall $\lambda=2 \pi \hbar / p$.)
## 13.4 Multielectron Atoms and the Periodic Table
**Exercise 13.4.1** Show that if we ignore interelectron interactions, the energy levels of a multielectron atom go as $Z^2$. Since the Coulomb potential is $Z e / r$, why is the energy $\propto Z^2$?

**Exercise 13.4.2** Compare (roughly) the sizes of the uranium atom and the hydrogen atom. Assume levels fill in the order of increasing $n$, and that the nonrelativistic description holds. Ignore interelectron effects.

**Exercise 13.4.3** Visible light has a wavelength of approximately $5000 \text{\AA}$. Which of the series-Lyman, Balmer, Paschen-do you think was discovered first?